A moment frozen in time, part I

Hispidocrinus scalaris, showing crown from underside, width = 6 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, showing crown from underside, width = 6 cm

The title of this blog says it already : “…and other fossils”…, so now’s the time to introduce you to (for a change) my other fossil passion :
echinoderms, more specifically starfish and crinoids. It really came more as a by-product of hunting for ammonites, mostly when my rucksack was already full on the way back, tiredly stumbling across the large blocks while taking a different route across the boulder strewn beach on the way home. It also happens that I pick up rocks with crinoid or starfish content when I´m frustrated because there is nothing else (meaning decent ammonites) to find – almost as if you have to be in a certain state of mind to notice these fossils, when your attention is no longer focused on other fossils, similar to when you start hearing strange sounds in the dark night when your visual sense becomes useless…
This of course has to do something with the difference in the “search mode” when your looking for ammonites vs. starfish / crinoids : With ammonites, on the Yorkshire coast you´re mostly looking for concretions, while with starfish / crinoids you´re carefully surveying the surfaces of (potentially large) fallen blocks – this also explains the of course totally unobjective observation that I tend to find crinoids / starfish mostly on the return from a location : I tend to use the easier way across the large blocks, and it´s usually later in the day, which makes for nice low angled light and better chances to see the delicate fossils…

For intact, articulated preservation, fragile animals like starfish and crinoids need fast embedding, because decay sets in quickly, e.g. for brittle stars, already after half a day. Brittle stars cannot free themselves when they´re suddenly covered by more than 5 cm of sediment – most of the brittle star fossils on the Yorkshire coast have probably been created by rapid burial in sediment, like a sediment avalanche – truly a moment frozen in time.
Some of the crinoids that can be found articulated are thought to have been deposited in scour troughs.
In Yorkshire, subzones where the liklihood of finding articulated crinoids or starfish are greatest are in my experience :
  • taylori
  • obtusum
  • oxynotum
  • maculatum
  • figulinum
  • stokesi
  • tenuicostatum
  • falciferum
Still – “greatest liklihood” does not mean they’re common fossils, finding an articulated crinoid or starfish remains a great rarity. The falciferum zone is the odd one out here, since benthic conditions were mostly anoxic during this time (very little oxygen at the bottom) – so there are no starfish, and crinoids that occur were usually attached to drifting logs at the surface of the sea.
So the crinoids and starfish I’m showing you here now really represent more than 20 years collecting – please do not get the impression that fossils like these can be found on a day’s trip to the coast – unless of course you are extremely lucky !
Some of these have been purchased, some reside in collections other than my own and are pictured here by kind permission of their respective owners – you will see that in the notes for the fossils.
Generally preparation of starfish and crinoids most of the time is a difficult and time consuming task.
Their delicate structures are usually firmly embedded in the sediments and can only be retrieved if there is a difference between the surrounding matrix and the fossils which are usually preserved as calcite or pyrite. This difference can either be a difference in hardness, when the fossils are harder than the matrix – these fossils can be prepared mechanically, i.e. needles, airpens or – you might have guessed – air abrader. If there is no difference in hardness, there can also be the option of chemical preparation – when the fossils are more resistant to certain chemicals like acids or alkaline solutions than the matrix. In rare cases, the environment (or rather what we put into it – sulphur dioxide / nitrogen dioxide from burning fossil fuels reacting with water to form sulfurous/sulfuric resp. nitric/nitrous acid) or certain naturally occuring humic acids can do the job for us – but that is only really the exception.
This first part will be about the Yorkshire liassic crinoids, so without much further ado, here they are :

Eocomatula interbrachiatus (BLAKE, 1876)
Eocomatula interbrachiatus, width = 13 cm

Eocomatula interbrachiatus, width = 13 cm

This is one of the first more or less articulated crinoid crowns I´ve found on the Yorkshire coast.
Eocomatula interbrachiatus with Oistoceras ammonite

Eocomatula interbrachiatus with Oistoceras ammonite

Another specimen found by Keeley and Adrian which they kindly let me prep and photograph shows the crown in association
with an Oistoceras ammonite, which places the crinoid in the figulinum subzone of the lower Pliensbachian.
Eocomatula interbrachiatus as found, width = 24 cm

Eocomatula interbrachiatus as found, width = 24 cm

Eocomatula interbrachiatus prepared, height of detail = 12 cm

Eocomatula interbrachiatus prepared, height of detail = 12 cm

These crinoids only have a very short stem (only a few segments), which I´ve never found preserved so far.

Hispidocrinus scalaris (GOLDFUSS, 1831)

Hispidocrinus scalaris, slab as found, width = 30 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, slab as found, width = 30 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, prepped, width = 22 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, prepped, width = 22 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, detail with crown and small brittle stars

Hispidocrinus scalaris, detail with crown and small brittle stars

This is the crinoid specimen that really got me seriously started to try and collect all the known Yorkshire liassic crinoids. It was found on a very warm summers day in July 2007 when I was out collecting with friends and had found nothing at all up to this point – I picked up this 30 x 20 cm slab with some faint crinoid traces and put it in my bag so it at least felt like I had found something… At home I started prepping it with an air abrader (iron powder) and followed the visible arms of the crinoid into the rock. To my amazement more and more stems and arms appeared until after about 60 hours of prep work almost the whole slab showed a deathbed of multiple Hispidocrinus crinoids in an early state of decay. When looking carefully at the slab, you can even notice tiny little brittlestars that have either fed on the decaying crinoid or had used the crinoid to achieve a higher up filter feeding position or even benefit from the crinoids´excretions and got embedded with it.
Hispidocrinus scalaris, slab as found, width = 15 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, slab as found, width = 15 cm

Hispidocrinus scalaris, prepped

Hispidocrinus scalaris, prepped

Another specimen was found in a small 12 x 15 cm which was initially split after finding it since the outside did only show very faint crinoid traces.
As the split showed a crinoid inside, it was glued back together again and air abraded in about 20 hours.
It shows two crowns, with the larger one having all it´s arms folded unto itself. And of course there´s another small brittlestar (5 o´clock position at the bottom) …

Seirocrinus subangularis (MILLER, 1821)

Seirocrinus subangularis lens with ossicles, width = 18 cm

Seirocrinus subangularis lens with ossicles, width = 18 cm

Seirocrinus subangularis, detail of lens cross section

Seirocrinus subangularis, detail of lens cross section

This lens comes from the tenuicostatum zone of the lower Toarcian and shows remains of Seirocrinus subangularis and was prepared using an air abrader.
On the inside, this lens consists of almost 100% of crinoid ossicles amalgamated into a solid calcitic core.
Seirocrinus subangularis, crown on lens, width = 15 cm

Seirocrinus subangularis, crown on lens, width = 15 cm

Other side of lens with ammonite Dactylioceras tenuicostatum, width = 15 cm

Other side of lens with ammonite Dactylioceras tenuicostatum, width = 15 cm

Another specimen showing a beautiful crown of Seirocrinus was found by my friend Klaus, who paintakingly prepared this
specimen using potassium hydroxide pellets over the course of a couple of weeks, the final touchers were again made with an air abrader.
This specimen also handily shows a Dactylioceras tenuicostatum ammonite on the back of the nodule which tremendously helps dating it !

Isocrinus robustus (WRIGHT, 1858)

Isocrinus robustus, oxynotum subzone, 9 cm

Isocrinus robustus, oxynotum subzone, 9 cm

Isocrinus robustus, stem detail

Isocrinus robustus, stem detail

This crinoid was a surprise find on my birthday this year ! It sat neatly on the edge of a fallen rock most likely of oxynotum zone age and when found I had thought it was a Hispidocrinus in an unusual, almost 3D preservation. The surprise came at home when I prepped it using the air abrader and noticed that it did not have the characteristic spines of a Hispidocrinus. Dr Mike Simms kindly identified it as an early Isocrinus robustus.

Pentacrinites dichotomus (MCCOY, 1848)

Pentacrinites dichotomus, width of colony 20 cm

Pentacrinites dichotomus, width of colony 20 cm

This beautiful colony of Pentacrinites dichotomus from the Jet Rock in the Whitby area was found by Mike Marshall who prepared it by stabilizing the exposed weathered side of the thin fragile slab with a layer of epoxy putty and prepared it from the other side using an air abrader. The colony is nicely set into a slab of top jet dogger to stabilize it.

Jet with juvenile ?Pentacrinites

Small juvenile ?Pentacrinites crinoid on jet, width = 6 cm

Small juvenile ?Pentacrinites crinoid on jet, width = 6 cm

This beautiful section of a piece of solid black jet with a juvenile crinoid anchored to it was kindly given to me by a friend. It gives more evidence to the observation that some crinoids have used floating logs for anchoring themselves to during their lifetime and filter fed in the surface waters.

Balanocrinus gracilis (CHARLESWORTH, 1847)

Balanocrinus gracilis, ossicles with juvenile Amaltheus (1 cm diameter) ammonites

Balanocrinus gracilis, ossicles with juvenile Amaltheus (1 cm diameter) ammonites

Have you spotted the crinoid remains on this picture ? – don´t get distracted by the associated juvenile (~1 cm ) Amaltheus ammonites !
Of this one I yet have to find a crown. Disarticulated ossicles are no rarity in the stokesi and maculatum subzones, but sometimes extraction can be impossible.
The second part describing the starfish will be published next.
AndyS

Gagaticeras or “…ribs like rows of jet beads”

Gagaticeras cf. finitimum, 5 cm

Gagaticeras cf. finitimum, 5 cm

Gagaticeras in my mind somehow is more of a coincidental find, casually picked up on the way somewhere else – which of course does not do this fine ammonite genus any justice.Around Robin Hoods Bay it has been reasonably common in the last couple of years (though I´ve noticed a drop in the last 2-3 years), I´ve mostly found them almost eroded free or in nodules that were thrown onto the beach during storms, the beds they occur in are very often sanded over – since most of the coast is a SSSI you´re not really supposed to do any large-scale digging in them anyway.

As you start collecting Gagaticeras ammonites, at first sight they mostly look the same (especially in the field), you put them in the drawer as “Gagaticeras gagateum”.
You collect some more, clean them up as good as you can (they´re not easy to prep well because of their delicate inner whorls), put them in the drawer.

After a while, when looking into the drawer at what you´ve accumulated over the years, you begin to wonder and see little differences, a more pronounced keel here, rursiradiate ribbing there, differences in rib density etc.  A while ago after I acquired an air abrader, a re-preparation helped to work out some more details in the inner whorls.

When starting to document the Gagaticeras species for the book, I was really surprised (and pleased of course 🙂 )to see that I do actually have the four species that HOWARTH mentions in his Robin Hoods Bay / Bairstow collection paper !  I must admit though that it did take me some time to find the most characteristic specimen
for each species, there seem to be many intermediates (like the one pictured above, which has a very high rib density but almost no keel and no rib angle at the venter), which all the authors that have recently written about them (HOWARTH 2002, SCHLEGELMILCH 1976, GETTY 1973,…) have taken as a sign that intra-species variation may make it appear that there are more species than there really are – but that´s always the problem when you do not have a large enough collection to do statistical tests.

Here they are :

Gagaticeras gagateum (YOUNG & BIRD, 1828)

 

Gagaticeras gagateum, 3.5 cm, with aperture & keel view

Gagaticeras gagateum, 3.5 cm, with aperture & keel view

G. gagateum has a rib density of 20 – 24 ribs / whorl, but there is only the slightest hint of a keel on the venter, sometimes completely invisible.
Whorl section is more compressed than on the other species, i.e. the whorl is thicker than high.

Gagaticeras neglectum (SIMPSON, 1855)

 

Gagaticeras neglectum, 4 cm

Gagaticeras neglectum, 4 cm

Gagaticeras neglectum, 4 cm, keel view

Gagaticeras neglectum, 4 cm, keel view

G. neglectum has a rib density of about 20 ribs / whorl, but there is a (sometimes strong) keel on the venter. Whorl section compare to G. gagateum
is less depressed, almost round. The expression of the keel seems to be very variable.

Gagaticeras finitimum (BLAKE, 1876)

Gagaticeras finitimum, 3.7 cm, with aperture & keel view

Gagaticeras finitimum, 3.7 cm, with aperture & keel view

G. finitimum has the highest rib density (between 24 and 28 ribs per whorl) and the ribs meet at an angle at the venter.
Similarly to G. neglectum, there is a keel on the venter.

Gagaticeras exortum (SIMPSON, 1855)

Gagaticeras exortum, 3 cm, with keel with

Gagaticeras exortum, 3 cm, with keel with

G. exortum is the easiest to identify : Ribs are quite rursiradiate (leaning backwards), there is just a hint of a keel.
If my collection were considered representative, it would be the rarest species of the four. Rib density on the figured specimen is
23 ribs / whorl at 30 mm diameter, another specimen I´ve seen has 26 ribs/whorl at 50 mm diameter.

In case you´re wondering what this all has to do with jet beads ?
Well, “gagateus” is the greek name for jet and the citation in this post´s title is from YOUNG & BIRD´s original 1828 description of “Ammonites gagateus”
and simply refers to similarity of the black whorls with jet beads…

AndyS